Impairment Tests

According to IAS 36, long-term assets must be audited for impairment, on a case-by-case basis, and annually for intangible assets with an indefinite useful life.
Contact

Challenges in impairment testing

The central challenge of an impairment test in accordance with IAS 36 is the derivation of reliable payment forecasts for assets. However, it is precisely these that are necessary to set the cost of capital rate (WACC) taking into account market-specific risk premiums.

Assessment requirements

The valuation requirements of an impairment test relate to cash-generating units.

Plausibility

The assumptions must be inherently consistent and based on objective, consistent, and reliable data.

Documentation

The impairment test must be presented by complete and clearly structured documentation.

Our support

We carry out their impairment tests with specialist expertise and many years of experience.

Development of audit-proof valuation logic for cash-generating units (CGUs)
Professional creation of complex DCF models including capital costs (WACC)
Early identification of critical value drivers through targeted sensitivity analyses
Contact

Your benefits

Smooth approval by the auditor

More space to concentrate fully on operational business

Operate in a legally secure manner even in volatile market environments

This is how we assist you with Impairment Tests

Cash Generating Units

We first identify your cash-generating units and, based on this, create robust valuation models that precisely reflect all the requirements of IAS 36.

Parameter derivation

We determine market-oriented capital costs (WACC) and validate your planning assumptions using external benchmarks in order to create a reliable basis for usage value.

Audit-Proof Documentation

We summarize the results in a detailed valuation report, which, including all sensitivity analyses, is designed directly for audit by the auditor.

FAQ

Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.

What are Impairment Tests in accordance with IFRS?

Impairment Tests ensure that the assets shown in the balance sheet are not recognized above their actual recoverable amount. As part of this audit, the carrying amount of an asset is compared with its current market value or use value on a regular basis or in specific cases.

If the carrying amount exceeds this calculated value, a corresponding depreciation is made to realistically represent the financial position. This procedure is primarily intended to protect creditors and to provide transparent information for the capital market.

The systematic review consistently prevents an overvaluation of assets and sustainably strengthens the quality of financial reporting.

For which occasions are impairment tests required?

Impaired assets are mandatory on a regular basis during the annual review of goodwill and intangible assets with an unlimited useful life.

In addition, specific internal or external indications of an impairment, such as technological changes or significant market share losses, require an unscheduled review.

Even in the context of corporate transactions or significant restructuring, these analyses ensure a realistic presentation of the financial position on the balance sheet.

How are impairment tests specifically carried out?

During implementation, the carrying amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is first compared with the recoverable amount.

This recoverable amount corresponds to the higher value of the fair value minus sales costs and the usage value based on discounted cash flows. If the value determined in this way is below the carrying amount, a corresponding impairment is recorded in the balance sheet.

What are the key challenges in impairment tests?

The biggest challenge lies in forecasting future cash flows and determining an appropriate discount rate taking current market risks into account. In addition, the identification of cash-generating units requires a high level of technical expertise to correctly represent economic reality.

Since many parameters are based on discretionary powers, well-founded and verifiable documentation is essential for acceptance by auditors.